Voters Cite Hurricane Sandy in Climate Change Concerns
A flooded basement, hundreds of pictures and possessions destroyed, a family heartbroken at the loss of their home. This is just a small aftermath of Hurricane Sandy that struck Long Island and its surrounding areas six years ago. Over the years, families have had to pick themselves up, carrying with them the burden of rebuilding their homes as well as their lives.
“There was water everywhere,” says Rebecca Gonzalez, 20, a Staten Island resident. “My basement was completely flooded. Everything that was in the basement was lost and nothing was able to be recovered because there was too much damage.”
Gonzalez, a Hofstra University student, says she remembers the government helping out in some way, but she recalls many FEMA letters being rejected. She says, “It was a topic of conversation amongst our neighborhood. You would always ask for updates from each other and if they had a success, you would ask what they did [to see what] you didn’t do.”
Today, Gonzalez lives with the memories of Superstorm Sandy, which have influenced her perspective on the environment. She says, “Now that I’ve experienced something like Sandy, the destruction and aftermath has taught me that there are a lot of precautions that could be done in order to weaken the damage if something were to happen again. For those that don’t think the environment is an important issue, they need to think about what if it happened to them – what would you want the government to do if you were in a tough situation?”
“What would you want the government to do if you were in a tough situation?” – Gonzalez
As polling day quickly approaches, Long Islanders now have the opportunity to vote for politicians who will speak up for the environment. Legislative voting records for Nassau and Suffolk county politicians are available for the public to see, which can help come November.
View this post on Instagram
Throughout my years in #Congress, I have been a strong advocate for the #conservation of Long Island’s land and water. I have made it a top priority to protect our coastal area's environmental assets including the South Shore and #LongIslandSound. I support legislation aimed to improve and restore #water quality in the #LongIsland Sound and conduct studies to strengthen the implementation of Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (Long Island Sound Improvement Act). This Act also helps to develop strategies to increase public education and awareness with respect to the ecological health and water quality of the Sound. I have remained committed to securing funding for the protection of the Long Island Sound. Superstorm Sandy was the second largest natural disaster in our nation’s history and the most devastating and costly to affect #NewYork and Long Island. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, this damage is equivalent to 30 years of #erosion. The resulting exposure has left our #shoreline vulnerable to even moderate storms, and must be addressed immediately. The $61 billion Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, for which I fought in the House of Representatives, includes $5.3 billion in funding for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to undertake both emergency and long-term #beach restoration projects. I was proud to lead the fight to acquire funds to restore and fortify our shoreline. You can be certain that I will continue to work hard to ensure that our #environment is protected and safeguarded for future generations. (Photo courtesy of longisland.com)
Locally, District 2 Representative, Peter “Pete” King, who has been in office since 2013, claims to be a man for the environment. In a statement on his political website, he says, “I support legislation [that] aims to improve and restore water quality in the Long Island Sound while conducting studies to strengthen the implementation of the Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan.”
Yet, his voting record begs to differ. Over the course of his political career, he has been three times more likely to approve legislation that is anti-environment than pro-environment. According to the League of Conservation Voters Scorecard, his lifetime score is 16 percent, showing his actions don’t align with his words.
“If we fail [to] significantly reduce carbon pollution…we will experience…more intense weather events in the future.” – Rice
On the other hand, District 4 Representative, Kathleen Rice, has a lifetime score of 95 percent. From helping those who were affected by Sandy to expressing concern about the environment in general, Rice has emphasized the importance of being aggressive when it comes to protecting our world and the issue of climate change. On her website, she says, “There is no doubt that if we fail [to] significantly reduce carbon pollution, sea levels with keep rising and we will experience more frequent and more intense weather events in the future.”
With politicians in office that are on both sides of the spectrum, it is up to the public to go out and vote for the issues that they are concerned about. Yet, millennials have one of the lowest turnout rates when it comes to voting. According to a Newsweek article, “only 16 percent of eligible voters between the ages of 18 and 29 bothered” to show up to vote in the 2014 midterm election.
Craig Burnett, an assistant professor of political science at Hofstra University, says the reason why many people do not vote is because they have their eyes on the presidency. He says, “Many people are only watching for the presidency. That’s [like only] watching the major sporting events, for example, the World Series or the Super Bowl.”
Former President Barack Obama has even echoed these same concerns. Back in September 2018, he gave a speech at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where he stated, “You can’t opt out [of voting] because you don’t feel sufficiently inspired by this or that particular candidate. This is not a rock concert, this is not Coachella. You don’t need a messiah. All we need are decent, honest, hardworking people who are accountable – and who have America’s best interests at heart.”
This is where people like Adrienne Esposito come in, who, along with her team, help to educate those in making their own decisions when it comes to voting, especially when dealing with the environment.
Esposito, who is the executive director of the Citizens Campaign for the Environment, says it is the job of Long Islanders to understand what is happening in their hometowns and how they can institute change. She says, “Every individual action matters. Every person who makes a small change contributes to the overall change.”
— Adrienne Esposito (@earthvoice17) May 4, 2018
As part of the Citizens Campaign for the Environment, Esposito tries to raise awareness about the scientific issues relating to climate change. She also does not shy away from emphasizing the importance of contacting elected officials in your area to express concerns. Esposito says, “Elected officials respond to what the public is talking about. Younger people need to call their senate assembly offices and ask them what they are doing about climate change.”
“Every individual action matters.” – Esposito
For young individuals who are looking to make a change, especially in regards to the environment, Burnett has one piece of advice: show up to vote on election day. He says, “Younger people care about the environment; they tend to be more liberal on issues and they don’t [view] the current administration as pursuing policies they want them to pursue. It’s about taking this dissatisfaction and activating it in a way that turns up on election day.”